Story continues below advertisement
Van Holst tried to suggest he was “simply quoting information that is out there” before the committee chair, Coun. Shawn Lewis, cautioned him against presenting opinion as fact or “putting words into the mouths of the people who are in leadership positions.”
Van Holst then pivoted to raising concerns about testing requirements for those who are unvaccinated. City manager Lynne Livingstone explained that the city works with each staff member with an attestation to come up with an individual plan.
Trending Stories
Quebec’s public health director Horacio Arruda resigns amid latest COVID-19 wave
Don’t treat Omicron COVID-19 variant like the flu, WHO warns
“In some instances, that may mean remote work, which means they do not come into a facility, or it may mean that they are participating in the regular testing.“
While he said he still had some concerns, van Holst ended his comments by thanking staff for coming up with an individual program for each impacted staff member.
Coun. Maureen Cassidy then suggested that the committee not only vote to receive the report, but also to take the extra step to specify that they will take no action on it.
“I’m one of the caregivers for my father, who’s 88 years old, legally blind, he has multiple health issues. I have to go to his house four times a month. He cannot be alone. I am doing everything in my power, including vaccinations and booster shots, to keep myself safe so that I don’t kill my father,” she said.
Story continues below advertisement
“That is why I have asked the mover and seconder to take no action on this because I am so tired of talking about this. I’m tired of misinformation and disinformation being spread from the council floor.”
The committee voted unanimously to receive van Holst’s letter and take no action.
While van Holst’s letter called into question the effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against COVID-19 and suggested that the response to the Omicron wave has been panic- and fear-driven, “even if the variant appears less threatening,” experts have noted that while data suggests Omicron is less severe, it is not “mild.”
Additionally, because the virus is so transmissible, a smaller percentage of a larger number of cases still works out to a very large number of hospitalizations, as evidenced by current provincial data.
Data released Tuesday indicates that 46 per cent of people currently in Ontario hospitals with COVID-19 were admitted for other reasons but it’s not clear how that compares with previous waves of the pandemic as that data was never provided.
The letter also argued that “any gain our hospitals may have made by mandating vaccines for all their employees has been neutralized by the loss of experienced staff.”
Story continues below advertisement
In reality, in London, less than one per cent of staff at London Health Sciences Centre and St. Joseph’s Health Care London were let go for failing to adhere to vaccine policies.
The Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table also suggested that the mandates would actually reduce staff shortages because fewer employees would be likely to get infected by the virus, though that data predates the arrival of the Omicron variant, which has resulted in 434 active staff cases at LHSC and 109 cases among health-care workers at St. Joseph’s as of Jan. 10 and also prompted a reduction in provincial isolation requirements.
The science around approved COVID-19 vaccinations is clear, but the legal and ethical aspects of vaccine mandates are less so. A series of recent decisions suggests labour arbitrators are considering the specifics of each workplace and policy, experts said, focusing on a balance between the rights of employees seeking not to be vaccinated and the rights of others to a safe workplace.
— with files from Global News’ Gabby Rodrigues, Ryan Rocca, Andrew Graham and Sawyer Bogdan; The Canadian Press’s Paola Loriggio, Nicole Thompson and Holly McKenzie-Sutter; and Reuters’ Mrinalika Roy
Advertisement
© 2022 Global News, a division of Corus Entertainment Inc.
